Which factor is typically NOT a consideration when setting up an AAR?

When setting up an After Action Review (AAR), it is essential to focus on factors that facilitate a productive discussion and learning environment. The physical location of the meeting plays a critical role in ensuring that participants can engage effectively, fostering an appropriate atmosphere. The number of participants is also significant, as it influences the dynamics of the discussion and the ability to manage participation effectively. Additionally, the agenda topics are vital because they outline the areas of focus for the review, ensuring that the meeting remains structured and productive.

However, individual performance ratings of each participant are typically not a consideration when establishing an AAR. The purpose of an AAR is to review processes and outcomes collectively rather than to evaluate individual performances. Such a focus on individual ratings could create an environment of defensiveness and hinder open communication among team members. Instead, AARs emphasize collective learning and improvement, allowing teams to identify successes and areas for enhancement without assigning blame or highlighting individual shortcomings. This collaborative approach helps reinforce teamwork and shared accountability. Therefore, individual performance ratings do not align with the objectives of an AAR.